Endocardial/epicardial versus endocardial encircling cryoablation for ventricular tachycardia: A randomized trial

1. Download : Download high-res image (115KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Exploring the outcome of multiple sclerosis among Saudi adult patients: A single-centered cross-sectional study at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh,Saudi Arabia

Objectives:To assess the outcome and impact of multiple sclerosis (MS) using validated Arabic versions of the Barthel index (BI) multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29), the modified Rankin scale (mRS), and the expanded disability status scale (EDSS).Methods:A cross-sectional study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, during July-November 2017. All Saudi adult patients diagnosed with MS between 2000-2016 (269 patients) were included. Patients were contacted via phone calls and were assessed using a newly developed and validated multi-component questionnaire that included demographic data, disease course, and Arabic versions of the scales.Results:Out of 269 patients, 210 (78.2%) responded. The average patient age was 37.44±10.3 years. The majority were females (69.5%). Only, 51 (24.3%) patients reported worsening conditions. Annually, the average relapse rate was 2.28±1.91. In regard to patient outcomes, 120 (57.1%) showed no significant disability in mRS, 146 (69.5%) were ambulatory without aid in EDSS, and 185 (89.4%) were independent in BI scores. The average MSIS-29-PHYS score was 33.6±27.6 and MSIS-29-PSYCH score was 38.2±25.8. Modified Rankin scale and EDSS were significantly associated with the current use of disease-modifying therapy (DMT). Modified Rankin scale was negatively associated with delayed diagnosis. Barthel index showed significant association with medication compliance and the absence of attacks.Conclusion:Majority of patients had a favorable outcome that was linked with the use of DMT, compliance, early diagnosis, and absence of attacks.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disease that is singularly characterized by multifocal areas of demyelination in the central nervous system (CNS). Though its precise etiology is unclear, the pathogenesis of the disease is believed to be immune-mediated myelin destruction and, eventually, axon disruption, which is the main cause behind the progressive disability.1 Multiple sclerosis is the most common neurological autoimmune disorder in the world, with an estimated number of 2.3 million until 2013. The increase from 2.1 million in 2008 to 2.3 million in 2013 has raised not only epidemiologists’ interest and alarm but also neurologists’.2 As of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, it was estimated that 40/100,000 is the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in 2008.3 When it comes to gender, women are generally more affected than men, estimated by a study carried out in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.4 Affected person’s average age of onset is 30 years.The outcome and prognosis of MS do not only vary depending on a plethora of factors but are also unpredictable in nature. It is well-recognized in the literature that MS can cause disability with varying degrees, and this can have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and daily activities.5 However, the outcome is not thoroughly studied, especially in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. To predict MS patient outcomes, conventional and physician-based validated scales are usually used, one of which is the EDSS. It mainly assesses the degree of disability and monitors the diseases’ progression but with several limitations which are documented, such as its insensitivity to change over a spectrum of 2-3 years.6 Therefore, in this study, we additionally considered other vital scores and scales that not only assess disability via the EDSS, but also the mRS. Moreover, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is evaluated by the MSIS-29 and the BI. Such measures will help us to have a more objective and reliable endpoint regarding the patients’ outcome and survival.In this study, we hypothesised that the outcome in regard to disability and HRQoL would differ depending on the variables we took into consideration when assessing MS. Thus, the aim was to evaluate the outcome of this neurological disease that we call MS.     

Quality of life measurement in skin cancer patients: literature review and position paper of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes,Melanoma and Non‐Melanoma Skin Cancer

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient Oriented Outcomes, Melanoma and Non‐Melanoma Skin Cancer (NMSC) present a review of the literature and position statement on health‐related (HR) QoL assessment in skin cancer patients. A literature search was carried out to identify publications since 1980 that included information about the impact of SC on QoL. Generic, dermatology‐specific, cancer‐specific, SC‐specific, facial SC‐specific, NMSC‐specific, basal cell carcinoma‐specific and melanoma‐specific QoL questionnaires have been used to assess HRQoL in SC patients. HRQoL was assessed in the context of creation and validation of the HRQoL instruments, clinical trials, comparison of QoL in SC and other cancers, other diseases or controls, HRQoL assessment after treatment, comorbidities, behaviour modification, predictors of QoL and survival, supportive care needs, coping strategies and fear of cancer recurrence. The most widely used instruments for HRQoL assessment in SC patients are the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ‐C30), the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐Melanoma (FACT‐M), Skin Cancer Index (SCI), Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF‐36) and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The TFs recommend the use of the cancer‐specific EORTC QLQ‐C30, especially in late stages of disease, and the melanoma‐specific FACT‐M and SC‐specific SCI questionnaires. These instruments have been well validated and used in several studies. Other HRQoL instruments, also with good basic validation, are not currently recommended because the experience of their use is too limited. Dermatology‐specific HRQoL instruments can be used to assess the impact of skin‐related problems in SC. The TFs encourage further studies to validate HRQoL instruments for use in different stages of SC, in order to allow more detailed practical recommendations on HRQoL assessment in SC.     

Extracts of different pollen species and their effect on human tear fluid and an epithelial cell line

Purpose: Hazelnut and birch pollen are known to destroy tear film components and attack ocular surface cells. We investigated further pollen species from different plant families, whether they show similar effects on human tear fluid and an epithelial cell line in vitro, to provide a broad basis for further research on pollen reactions affecting the tear film and ocular surface.

Materials and methods: Regional pollen species from different plant families (Adoxaceae, Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Juglandaceae, Malvaceae, Oleaceae, Pinaceae, Plantaginaceae, Poaceae, Salicaceae, Sapindaceae) were collected. Their proteolytic activity was evaluated by Zymography. Human tear fluid and cells of an epithelial cell line were incubated with pollen extracts. Tear fluid was analyzed by Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Cytomorphology was assessed microscopically and cell viability by proliferation (MTS), water-soluble tetrazolium (WST-1) assay and the impedance-based xCELLigence real-time analysis (RTCA).

Results: Zymography revealed significant protease activity and PAGE showed the degradation of tear proteins by different pollen species. Cells incubated with pollen extracts presented dose- and time-dependent cytomorphological changes. MTS, WST-1, and RTCA revealed cytostatic as well as cytotoxic effects of pollen extracts.

Conclusions: Pollen species from different plant families exert proteolytic activity and degrade human tear fluid as well as epithelial cells, which may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of allergic and non-allergic reactions affecting the ocular surface.